Abstract [331]
 
 
Determination of the coeficient of variation of continuous non-invasive hemoglobin measurement
 
Soliveres J., Balaguer J., Sánchez A., Estruch M., Hernández M.J., Solaz C.
University Hospital Dr Peset, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Valencia, Spain
 
Background and Goal of Study: Non invasive continuous determination of haemoglobin may be very important. Variation of measurement can be due to device variability, including self calibration (coefficient of variation -CV-) or real patient changes. Our aim is to determine the CV since it has not been reported yet for this device.
Materials and Methods: After local ethics committee approval, written informed consent was obtained from patients scheduled to any kind of surgery. After standard monitoring, a Rainbow R2-25™ (Masimo, US) probe was placed in the middle finger of the contralateral iv line hand according to the manufacturer's recommendations. After a standard anaesthesia induction, the probe was connected to a monitor (Masimo Radical 7™, USA), and non invasive haemoglobin determination (SpHb) started. No iv liquids (except to maintain blood pressure, if necessary) were administered. Anaesthesia was maintained with 1-2% sevoflurane in oxygen. No surgical procedure was performed during 40 minutes. If perfusion index was lower than 1, data were rejected. Doing this way, SpHb variations are likely to be due to monitor variability rather than patient changes. After surgery, data were downloaded to a computer (Masimo TendCom™, Masimo, US), obtaining one recording every 2 seconds. CV was analyzed offline for 8 periods of five minutes, then in periods of ten minutes (4 periods) and finally in two periods of 20 minutes. CV from each patient and each period of time was compared with the others, in order to find out the maximum period of variability and the actual CV, which is the lowest one of all the measurements. A CV below 2,8% (within-subject biologic variation) would be desirable. Comparison was performed with Student's t test or ANOVA with Bonferroni correction as appropriate. P< 0,05 was considered significant.
Results and Discussion: 35 patients were enrolled. One of them was withdrawn due to haemodynamic problems and one due to low perfusion index. 1200 determinations were obtained for each patient. Table shows CV at each moment.
Minutes0-55-1010-1515-2020-2525-3030-3535-40
CV (%)1,4 (1,4)0,7 (0,6)1,5 (0,5)1,7 (0,6)0,8 (1,0)0,9 (1,0)0,7 (0,6)1,1 (2,9)
Minutes0-1010-2020-3030-40    
CV (%)2 (5,3)1,8 (1,3)1,2 (1,2)1,2 (1,3)    
Minutes0-2020-40      
CV (%)2,8 (3,7)1,6 (1,4)      
[Time interval CV. Data show mean (SD) (*)p<0,05]

Conclusion(s): In our study, CV has been established in 1,6% (DE=1,4%). When using SpHb, first 20 minutes should be discarded.